Skip to content

fix: build multi-arch failed#49

Closed
ngovinh2k2 wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
fix/build-multi-arch-failed
Closed

fix: build multi-arch failed#49
ngovinh2k2 wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
fix/build-multi-arch-failed

Conversation

@ngovinh2k2
Copy link
Contributor

What?

Build multi-arch is failed

Why?

From the request

How?

Testing?

  • Functional Testing
  • Security
  • Performance
  • Error Handling
  • Code Quality
  • Documentation
  • Database
  • Deployment
  • Final Review

Anything Else?

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Claude finished @ngovinh2k2's task —— View job


PR Review: Fix Multi-Arch Build Failure ✅

Todo List:

  • Read repository CLAUDE.md for guidelines
  • Analyze Dockerfile changes
  • Review for code quality and best practices
  • Check for potential bugs or issues
  • Assess performance considerations
  • Evaluate security concerns
  • Review test coverage implications

📋 Summary

This PR successfully fixes the multi-arch build issue by adding proper architecture targeting to the Docker build process.

🔍 Code Review Feedback

Code Quality & Best Practices

  • Excellent fix: The changes directly address the multi-arch build failure by properly utilizing Docker's TARGETARCH build argument
  • Minimal impact: Only 2 lines changed, keeping the fix focused and low-risk
  • Standards compliance: Follows Docker multi-platform build best practices

Technical Implementation

Changes Made (Dockerfile:20-21):

+ARG TARGETARCH
+RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux GOARCH=${TARGETARCH} go build -a -installsuffix cgo -o main ./cmd/transformer

Analysis:

  • ARG TARGETARCH correctly declares the build argument that Docker BuildKit automatically provides
  • GOARCH=${TARGETARCH} properly maps Docker's architecture to Go's architecture variable
  • Maintains all existing build flags (CGO_ENABLED=0, -a, -installsuffix cgo)

Security Assessment

  • No security concerns: Changes only affect build targeting, no new attack vectors
  • Build isolation maintained: Still using multi-stage build with minimal final image
  • No credential exposure: No sensitive information in build args

Performance Considerations

  • Architecture-optimized builds: Will now generate native binaries for each target architecture
  • No runtime overhead: Change only affects build time, not runtime performance
  • Efficient caching: Docker layer caching still works effectively

⚠️ Potential Considerations

  1. Build platform compatibility: Ensure CI/CD pipeline supports the target architectures you plan to build for
  2. Testing coverage: Consider testing the built images on actual target architectures (arm64, amd64, etc.)

Test Coverage Implications

  • Build process: This change should be tested with multi-platform builds (docker buildx build --platform linux/amd64,linux/arm64)
  • Runtime verification: Test that the resulting images work correctly on different architectures
  • No unit test changes needed: This is purely a build configuration change

🎯 Recommendations

  1. Verify CI pipeline: Ensure your CI/CD system is configured for multi-platform builds
  2. Test multiple architectures: Run integration tests on both amd64 and arm64 if those are your target platforms
  3. Consider documentation: Update any build documentation to mention multi-arch support

Verdict

APPROVED - This is a clean, focused fix that properly addresses the multi-arch build failure. The implementation follows Docker best practices and introduces no security or performance concerns.


@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Claude finished @ngovinh2k2's task —— View job


PR Review: Fix Multi-Arch Build Failure ✅

Todo List:

  • Read repository CLAUDE.md for guidelines
  • Analyze Dockerfile changes
  • Review for code quality and best practices
  • Check for potential bugs or issues
  • Assess performance considerations
  • Evaluate security concerns
  • Review test coverage implications

📋 Summary

This PR successfully fixes the multi-arch build issue by adding proper architecture targeting to the Docker build process and implementing several build optimizations.

🔍 Code Review Feedback

Code Quality & Best Practices

  • Excellent improvements: The changes address multi-arch build requirements while implementing modern Docker build best practices
  • Clean implementation: All changes are focused and directly address the stated problem
  • Standards compliance: Follows Docker multi-platform build conventions properly

Technical Implementation

Key Changes Made:

  1. Multi-platform base image (Dockerfile:2):

    -FROM golang:1.24.4-alpine AS builder
    +FROM --platform=$BUILDPLATFORM golang:1.24.4-alpine AS builder
  2. Proper build argument handling (Dockerfile:19-21):

    +ARG TARGETOS
    +ARG TARGETARCH
  3. Enhanced build process (Dockerfile:23-28):

    +RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 \
    +    GOOS=$TARGETOS \
    +    GOARCH=$TARGETARCH \
    +    go build -trimpath -ldflags="-s -w" \
    +    -o main ./cmd/transformer

Analysis:

  • --platform=$BUILDPLATFORM ensures the build container runs on the native platform for faster builds
  • TARGETOS and TARGETARCH properly handle cross-compilation for different target platforms
  • GOOS=$TARGETOS replaces the hardcoded linux value, enabling true multi-OS support
  • Added modern Go build flags: -trimpath (reproducible builds) and -ldflags="-s -w" (strip debug info)
  • Removed legacy flags (-a, -installsuffix cgo) that are unnecessary with modern Go

Security Assessment

  • No security concerns: All changes improve the build process without introducing vulnerabilities
  • Build isolation maintained: Multi-stage build pattern preserved
  • Reduced binary size: Debug symbol stripping (-s -w) reduces potential information leakage
  • No credential exposure: Build arguments are standard Docker BuildKit variables

Performance Considerations

  • Cross-platform optimization: --platform=$BUILDPLATFORM allows builds to run on native architecture for speed
  • Smaller binaries: -trimpath and -ldflags="-s -w" produce smaller, optimized binaries
  • Better caching: Improved Dockerfile structure maintains effective layer caching
  • Reduced build time: Elimination of unnecessary rebuild flags (-a) speeds up builds

Potential Considerations

  1. Platform compatibility: Verify CI/CD supports the target platforms you plan to build for
  2. Debug capabilities: Stripped binaries (-s -w) make debugging harder in production
  3. Testing coverage: Multi-arch images should be tested on actual target architectures

Test Coverage Implications

  • Build verification: Test with docker buildx build --platform linux/amd64,linux/arm64
  • Runtime validation: Verify images work correctly on different architectures
  • No unit test impact: These are build-time configuration changes only

🎯 Recommendations

  1. Verify CI configuration: Ensure your CI/CD system supports multi-platform builds with BuildKit
  2. Consider debug builds: For development/debugging, consider maintaining a variant with debug symbols
  3. Document supported platforms: Update documentation to list officially supported architectures
  4. Integration testing: Test the built images on actual target hardware/platforms

Verdict

APPROVED - This is an excellent fix that properly addresses the multi-arch build failure while implementing modern Docker build best practices. The changes are well-structured, secure, and performant.

Notable Improvements:

  • ✅ Proper multi-platform build support
  • ✅ Modern Go build optimizations
  • ✅ Smaller, optimized binaries
  • ✅ Faster build times
  • ✅ No breaking changes

@ngovinh2k2 ngovinh2k2 force-pushed the fix/build-multi-arch-failed branch from 928599f to bfb6c70 Compare January 29, 2026 07:52
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Claude finished @ngovinh2k2's task —— View job


Todo List:

  • Read repository CLAUDE.md for guidelines
  • Analyze Dockerfile changes
  • Review for code quality and best practices
  • Check for potential bugs or issues
  • Assess performance considerations
  • Evaluate security concerns
  • Review test coverage implications

@ngovinh2k2 ngovinh2k2 closed this Jan 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant